Tekline Publishing Home Page
The Cancer Plague
Independant Cancer Research
  • Tekline Home
  • The Answer
  • Doomwatch 2050
  • Back
  • Email Me
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
SPECIFIC CANCERS
I shall be adding information on all cancers known in the months to come. I start with Breast Cancer.
  • Breast Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
Cancer Cell

     While the world's scientists debate and argue about Global Warming, and with good reason, something more dreadful is occurring that has greater far reaching consequences. Since the beginning of the 20th century, a plague unlike any other in history as been sweeping the world. The plague is CANCER, at it is slow, it is quiet and it is deadly. It has now reached pandemic proportions and yet it is almost a secret. "After decades of misleading assurances of major progress in the war against cancer the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society in a stunning reversal admitted that the incidence of cancer is expected to double by 2050. In 2003 a WHO report stated that global cancer rates could increase by 50% to 15 million by 2020. But it is far worse than anyone thinks. Why this site? If you read some of the articles on this page you can see why there is a need for Independant Cancer Research ...

     It is my objective through this site to bring you the facts, the real facts as to what is going on. I shall seperate the truth from the lies, and sort out the facts from the fiction. I will leave no stone unturned in this endeavour because you have the right to know who or what is killing you - and why. But I also offer HOPE! Not only will I tell you about the causes of the various kinds of cancer, I shall also describe various ways in which you can prevent you from getting the disease in the first place. And, for those who have been diagnosed with cancer, I can now tell you about a remarkable REAL cure for cancer that has recently been discovered.....

Why we are Losing the War on Cancer
by Clifton Leaf

    Avastin, Erbitux, Gleevec - The new wonder drugs might make you think we’re finally beating this dreaded scourge. We’re not.

     Ruth Etzioni, a biostatistician at Seattle’s Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, points out that when you break down the Big Four cancers (lung, colon and rectal, breast, and prostate) by stage—that is, how far the malignant cells have spread—long-term survival for advanced cancer has barely budged since the 1970s

The Hope & The Hype
By Christine Gorman

     For a few heady days in 1998, it seemed as if the whole world was a cancer patient and that all humankind had been granted a reprieve. Triggered by a front-page medical news story in the usually reserved New York Times, all anybody was talking about--on the radio, on television, on the Internet, in phone calls to friends and relatives--was the report that a combination of two new drugs could, as the Times put it, "cure cancer in two years." But it was all a mistake! It was hype that had got out of control.

Cancer: A Disease of Civilization?
by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D

     It seems clear to me that cancer was not a major medical problem in recorded history until the last 150 years. And even today, populations that eat an indigenous diet rarely, if ever, get cancer. (Unfortunately, such populations are exceedingly scarce in this century.) However, in reviewing the evidence from these cultures as well as our own, the key issue for cancer prevention does not seem to be whether the diet is vegetarian or meat-eating, or whether it contains high quantities of fat and protein.

     The single most drastic change in the Western diet, which has occurred simultaneously with rising rates of cancer among those who consume it, has been the cheap availability of white flour, white sugar, and refined sweeteners such as corn syrup, as well as their inclusion in just about every food in the marketplace. The key to cancer prevention may turn out to be avoidance of the same foods that make your blood sugar run wild and that cause a plethora of other illnesses.

The Tobacco Timeline
by Gene Borio

     The Story of Tobacco, its use and it's abuse. The timeline provides a blow by blow account of the how the tobacco companies decieved the masses, became rich on what amounts to mass murder, and the fight back by those not in their pay. It has taken a long time but many countries are now passing legislation for smoke free zones, with the UK leading the way. However, the tobacco companies have set their sights to the developing word.... it is not over yet.

Guilty as Charged
by William V. Corr

     The tobacco companies have been found guilty of a 50 year conspiracy of lies, deception, disease, and death and of continuing to violate the law, but members of Congress are still taking millions of dollars from them . . . .

     Our leaders should stand up to the tobacco companies, return their contributions and reject future donations from this rogue industry.” William V. Corr, executive director of the Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, on the release of the CTFK/Common Cause report which found that in the current election cycle, 257 U.S. representatives and senators (48 percent) have accepted contributions from tobacco political action committees (PACs).
(Wednesday, September 20, 2006)

American Cancer Society receives largest ever donation from AstraZeneca
by Jacki Donaldson

     International pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca is donating $10 million to the American Cancer Society (ACS). The donation is one of the largest gifts ever received by the ACS and will help provide support for patients in United States hospitals.

     London-based AstraZeneca, maker of breast cancer drug tamoxifen and other breast and prostate cancer drugs, made $26 billion in sales last year.

IS THIS A BRIBE? SEE BELOW.

AstraZeneca - The Breast Cancer Biz
by Allison Sloan

     How the companies that cause cancer also treat cancer.

     Zeneca is also the founder, since 1985, of October's National Breast Cancer Awareness Month (NBCAM), with its false message, "Early detection is your best prevention." If cancer is detected, it is obviously too late for prevention. This annual event markets the notion that mammography is our only weapon in fending off breast cancer, omitting any mention of possible environmental causes or of true prevention. "The sole mission of NBCAM is to promote the importance of the three-step application to early detection: mammography, clinical breast exam and breast self-exam," says NBCAM's promotional brochure.

     Although early detection through mammography does save some lives, the brochure neglects to mention that medical irradiation, including mammography and other X-rays, is a known cause of breast cancer in younger women. As the manufacturer of pesticides and cancer treatment drugs, and as owner of cancer treatment centers, it is clearly detection and not prevention that benefits Zeneca's business plan.

Cancer Inc
by Sharon Batt & Liza Gross

     They make the chemicals, they run the treatment centers, and they're still looking for "the cure" - no wonder they won't tell you about breast cancer prevention.

Cancer and the Environment
by Sierra Club of Canada

     After thirty years, one is entitled to ask why we are losing the war against cancer? The answer is likely that we have focussed our resources on only part of the problem. In fact, the funding has been directed nearly entirely to the lab coat work of finding a cure. Virtually ignored has been pursuing and eliminating the potential causes of the disease. The old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” has been turned on its head. That pound of cure is viewed as more valuable than any amount of prevention.

     The horrible secret of the war against cancer is that preventing the causes of cancer will cut into the profits of those who fund the cure. "You've got a company that's a spinoff of one of the world's biggest manufacturers of carcinogenic chemicals, they've got control of breast cancer treatment, they've got control of the chemoprevention [studies], and now they have control of cancer treatment in eleven centers-which are clearly going to be prescribing the drugs they manufacture."

The Prime Cause and Prevention of Disease
by Dr. Otto Warburg

     Warburg won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1931 for his discovery of the oxygen transferring enzyme of cell respiration

     Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes. Almost anything can cause cancer. But, even for cancer, there is only one prime cause. The prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen ... in normal body cells by fermentation of sugar.

Facing Silent Spring
by Anil Agarwar

     Pesticides. Ecological devastation. And cancer. The story of an environmental victim. As an environmental activist and writer, Anil Agarwal had tried for years to promote nationwide concern about the deteriorating state of our environment. The idea of writing about his own travails as an environmental victim had, however, never crossed my mind. But he could not have escaped what was and is happening all around me and he too succumbed to cancer.

     Cancer is a frightening word. It means a terminal disease with periods of excruciating pain. And the treatment, full of poisons, was often as horrific as the disease itself, he said. Anil Agarwal passed away on January 2, 2002, after a seven-year battle against cancer. In 1999, he wrote this article on his experience with cancer. He believed that his own cancer had a message and I agree. He is one of millions of individuals who have died and shared his misery while the chemical industry grow rich on the products they sell that cause cancer...

Breast Cancer "Cause - Prevention - Cure"
Just Published
by Fred Harding
     THE BOOK THAT EXPLODES THE MYTH THAT BREAST CANCER CANNOT BE PREVENTED OR CURED

     In 2006 the predecessor to this work, Breast Cancer "Prevention and Cure" Your Choice! was published and it received five-star ratings from Amazon UK readers. The present work replaces, updates and expands upon this book and it includes two new essential chapters that, with several hundred references, shows conclusively what causes the disease and how to prevent it.

     Finally the book brings to the attention of the reader news of a remarkable cure that has been discovered by two medical professors at one of America's leading Universities. The science behind the drug has proved to be sound and trials have been very successful. It brings to a conclusion three years of research and the most important book that you will ever read on the subject of breast cancer.
(February 2007)

Sherlock Holmes Solves the Nun's Disease
World Exclusive
by Fred Harding
     Using the character of Sherlock Holmes and his methods for the basis of of one of the chapters in the book Breast Cancer "Prevention and Cure" Your Choice I believe I am the first person to answer the riddle that has perplexed scholars and the medical profession for three hundred years or more - the riddle why nuns were more prone to breast cancer than other women.

     The document you are about to read is from the eleventh chapter of my book Breast Cancer "Prevention and Cure" Your Choice! The premise of the book is that it is primarily chemicals in our environment that cause breast cancer (and other cancers) and that our bodies are full of toxins, the body burden, as it is known. Our bodies however do have very efficient mechanisms to remove such toxins but the problem is that modern restrictive clothing, dietary factors and other related issues hamper these mechanisms described in the book. But if the thesis of my book is correct there is one thing that needs to be addressed. It is the riddle why nuns were particularly prone to getting the disease during the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, more so than other women were. It is a riddle that has perplexed many a learned mind and until now nobody has come up with a satisfactory explanation. It is because of the frequency of breast cancer among nuns that the disease was known until recent times as "The Nun’s Disease".....
(April 2006)

Mole: The Tumour That Isn't
by Gina Kolata (New York Times)

     For those of us with dozens of moles, the spots speckling our skin can seem no more significant than freckles. But it turns out, each mole is a tumor of pigment cells that started on a path to cancer and then stopped. The cells do not divide again. A mole is an incipient cancer that halted in its tracks.

     It is a view that has surprised even scientists. Moles, it turns out, are a sort of strange hybrid in the cancer spectrum. They are little benign tumors, meaning they are harmless, with cells that cannot spread through the body like a cancerous tumor and kill a person. But moles start out the same way that malignant tumors start out, with a mutated gene that lets cells proliferate wildly....

Nuns, Virgins, and Spinsters'
by Dr.Malcolm Griffith

     In 1842, Italian investigators reported little to no cervical cancer among Catholic nuns compared with the rest of the Italian female. This observation has led the medical profession down a path to search for a sexually activated virus for the cause of cervical cancer but what if that observation was completely false?
(August 1991)

The Cancer Plague as a Social Event
By Robert Chernomas, PhD and Lissa Donner

     The World Health Organization estimates that 20% of cancers are genetic in origin and that 80% are environmentally based.This is good news,because it means that 80% of cancers are preventable.

     Critics of the war on cancer argue that it has largely been a failure.The widespread belief that we are making progress against cancer is an illusion.The vaunted increases in five year survival rates are misleading according to the critics because they now count things that are not cancer and because they are able to diagnose real cancer at an earlier stage,people appear to survive longer.Except for a few rare types of cancer,medicine can ’t claim any improvements in prognosis for patients with the most common forms of the disease.There are a handful of successes in cancer treatment but these are among relatively rare forms of cancer.Environmental,social and life factors appear to be much more important influences than medical ......
(March 2004)

Cancers use bone marrow cells to spread tumors, study finds
by John Lauerman, Bloomberg News

     Cancers use cells in bone marrow to create a fertile environment for tumors to spread to other parts of the body, according to a study of mice. The bone marrow cells help make blood vessels that provide oxygen and other nutrients needed by spreading cancers, said researchers led by Rosandra Kaplan, an oncologist at Cornell University's Weill Medical College in New York. The study appears in today's issue of Nature.

Toxic Apocalypse Now
by Tom Mower

     Your body is under siege, and the enemy is disguised as your friend. Like the Trojan Horse, many of your personal care products conceal harmful invaders and deliver them into the fortress of your body. Toxins, carcinogens, and mutagens are all commonly used "potentially harmful" ingredients in shampoos, conditioners, toothpastes, lotions, sun-blocks, and many other products that you trust to convey health and beauty to your body. But in reality, what you are getting with these products is gradual poisoning and increased risk of cancer. By using products without these harmful ingredients, you may have support in avoiding the toxic apocalypse of cancer.

Cosmetic chemicals found in breast tumours
by Gaia Vince (New Scientist)

     Preservative chemicals found in samples of breast tumours probably came from underarm deodorants, UK scientists have claimed.

     Their analysis of 20 breast tumours found high concentrations of para-hydroxybenzoic acids (parabens) in 18 samples. Parabens can mimic the hormone estrogen, which is known to play a role in the development of breast cancers. The preservatives are used in many cosmetics and some foods to increase their shelf-life.

Do conventional cancer treatments work?

     There is simply no evidence for the vast majority of cancers that treatment with these drugs exerts any positive influence on survival or quality of life in patients with advanced disease. The almost dogmatic belief in the efficacy of chemotherapy is usually based on false conclusions from inappropriate data.

     It is quite interesting to note that studies have shown that many oncologists would not take chemotherapy themselves if they had cancer.

Pollution: A life and death issue

     chemicals are a frequent pollutant. When we think of chemical contamination it is often images of events like Bhopal that come to mind. But the problem is widespread. One study says 7-20% of cancers are attributable to poor air and pollution in homes and workplaces. The WHO, concerned about chemicals that persist and build up in the body, especially in the young, says we may "be conducting a large-scale experiment with children's health".

     Some man-made chemicals, endocrine disruptors like phthalates and nonylphenol - a breakdown product of spermicides, cosmetics and detergents - are blamed for causing changes in the genitals of some animals. Affected species include polar bears - so not even the Arctic is immune. And the chemicals climb the food chain, from fish to mammals - and to us. About 70,000 chemicals are on the market, with around 1,500 new ones appearing annually. At least 30,000 are thought never to have been comprehensively tested for their possible risks to people.

The Link Between Pesticides and Breast Cancer

     The World Health Organisation estimates that 33% of all illness is due to environmental causes, a figure which rises to 40% in the case of children. For cancer, specifically, genetic factors represent scarcely 10% of cases. The rest are due to "what we eat, drink, breathe..., our lifestyle," according to Olea "although, as the study shows, some carcinogenic elements manage to incorporate themselves in our diet us giving them our permission to do so."

Cervical Cancer Virus Myth Exposed

by Fred Harding
     When I was researching my book Breast Cancer "Cause - Prevention - Cure" I came upon considerable evidence to show that chemicals (and radiation) was the primary cause of all cancers. But when I was looking into Cervical Cancer, this appeared to be the exception to the rule. According to the medical profession and most scientific literature discussing the subject this cancer is caused by a virus known as HPV (Human Papilloma Virus).

     It did seem to be an open and shut case, until I began to look into it deeper and then it became clear HPV was not responsible at all and that the medical profession had been following a false trail. The real culprit was staring them in the face and once again chemicals was involved.....
(September 2006)

Fragrances Hide Toxic Chemical Secrets
by Environmental Working Group

     A major loophole in federal law allows fragrance manufacturers to hide potentially hazardous chemicals in product scents, including substances linked to allergies, birth defects, and even cancer. Because they won't tell you what's in the scents they sell you, we combed through thousands of Valentine's Day gift ideas to bring you products that not only smell great, but that are also free of hidden, potentially hazardous fragrances.

Make-up Kit Holds Hidden Danger of Cancer
by Amelia Hill

     Women are being exposed to deadly diseases through the everyday use of common cosmetics bought over the counter, according to a new study.

     The growing list of synthetic ingredients manufacturers add to their products are turning the most innocent-looking shampoos and moisturisers into cocktails of toxins that could cause cancer over years of sustained use.

The Cancer Business
by Patrick Rattigan ND

     In Britain, at the present time, around one third of general hospital patients are suffering from cancer. Two out of five of the population have, or will develop, the disease. If we accept the figures, for cancer incidence, of 30 percent in 1980, 40 percent now and 50 percent in the year 2010, at the present rate of increase the figure will reach 100 percent around 2080. A multitude of factors suggest that the rise is set to accelerate. Dr Linus Pauling, double Nobel Laureate, declared: 'Everyone should know that the "War on Cancer" is, largely, a fraud.'.....

Cancer Research - A Super Fraud?
by Robert Ryan, B.Sc.

     According to Dr. Robert Sharpe, " . . . in our culture treating disease is enormously profitable, preventing it is not. In 1985 the U.S., Western Europe and Japanese market in cancer therapies was estimated at over 3.2 billion pounds with the 'market' showing a steady annual rise of 10 per cent over the past five years.

     Preventing the disease benefits no one except the patient. Just as the drug industry thrives on the 'pill for every ill' mentality, so many of the leading medical charities are financially sustained by the dream of a miracle cure, just around the corner."

Health Wars
by J.B.

     The cancer industry is so desperate to make money by "treating" patients that it will actually invoke the threat of physical violence (i.e. "gunpoint medicine") to force patients to comply. It just goes to show you how far removed modern medicine is from anything resembling healing, compassion, patients' rights or fundamental ethics. As rightly shown in this comic, some oncologists have become ego-driven monsters who can't wait to jab a needle into some poor kid.

     And it's all likely to get worse if we don't take back our health freedom from this system of medicine that has devolved into a corrupt, profit-seeking sham that routinely trades the lives of patients for corporate profits. Cancer is a multi billion-dollar industry, and there's only money to be made in "treating" cancer, not in actually preventing it or curing it, which is exactly why the cancer industry doesn't want anyone visiting alternative cancer clinics where cancer is routinely cured through herbs, nutrition, radical detoxification therapies and other treatments that really work.

The Cancer Industry
by No More Breast Cancer Campaign

     There would appear to be little hope for the 'primary prevention' of breast cancer becoming a priority for the cancer industry. Evidence for this situation can be found in the long-prevailing silence from the industry on environmental and occupational factors in breast cancer (and other cancers of the reproductive system).

     A thriving enterprise with a guaranteed future, 'cancer' is a growth industry in every sense of the word. It would be extremely unlikely that this particular industry would champion a case which has the potential to undermine its very existence.

Medical Charities & Cancer Research Hoax

     It may be hard to believe but the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer but to perpetuate the cancer industry consisting mostly of research and chemotherapy. In the US alone this was estimated to be $110 Billion yearly quite a few years ago.

     If the truth came out and was acted upon then over 90% of this income would vanish, quite apart from the political implications. As if the billions looted from the taxpayers wasn't enough, they then have to extract even more through the charities, who also play an important part in maintaining the deception, the American Cancer Society (ACS) being notable, as Barry Lynes documents in 'The Healing of Cancer.'

     Charities of this type are service-to-self posing as service-to-others, known as 'do-gooders', and there has to be some measure of (covert) hostility in promoting killer drugs such as AZT, most cancer chemotherapy, and maintaining most disease causes are a mystery with no know cures. The handmaidens of the Medical Cartel.

Corrupt Charities

     At one time, the American Cancer Society spent only 26 percent of its national multibillion-dollar budget on actual medical research, allotting the other three-fourths to “operating expenses.” In 2005, the Phoenix New Times reported that the Arizona branch of the organization spent a gasp-inducing 95 percent on overhead costs, leaving cancer victims “only the crumbs.

     At the Arizona branch, the nonprofit spends 22 times as much on paying employees, maintaining the offices, and keeping the coffee machine running than on the cancer victims they are supposedly aiming to save.

Cancer-Gate Book Review

     We don’t know what causes cancer, the pundits say. Nonsense, says Dr. Samuel Epstein.

     For more than a quarter of a century, Dr. Epstein has been exposing cancer’s causes. His ground-breaking and still preeminent book, The Politics of Cancer, published first in 1979 (updated in 1998), is an exhaustive account of what lies behind the cancer epidemic, and he has continued to publish articles and books about why so many of us, despite our efforts to lead a healthy life, will fall victim to this disease.

More Information This searing exposé of the NCI and ACS, and the proposed reforms of public policy have been endorsed by over a hundred leading independent experts in cancer prevention and public health, as well as by activist citizen groups.

Why The Cancer Industry Is Committed To Not Finding a Cure, and If They Do Run Across One, Suppressing It!
by James Carr

     To ask the American Cancer Society or the National Cancer Institute to find a cancer cure is to say, 'Now go. Be successful. And once you have achieved your aim, promptly commit suicide.' For once a real cancer cure or cures are announced, the need for these organizations, which collect hundreds of billions of dollars in the aggregate annually for treatment and research - from governments, agencies, foundations, corporations, insurance companies, and private individuals - all of them, without exception, will have lost their reason for existence. That is why a cancer cure will never come from their quarter

Charity Navigator

     Charity Navigator, America's premier independent charity evaluator, works to advance a more efficient and responsive philanthropic marketplace by evaluating the financial health of America's largest charities. Check the Cancer charities yourselves but prepare yourself for a shock!

 

 

 

 



www.teklinepublishing.com
teklinepublishing@yahoo.com
© Copyright Fred Harding
(All Rights Reserved)